Fates And Furies Helfen Sie uns den Weltbild Shop noch besser zu machen!
Lottos Charme bezwingt jeden, Mathildes Schönheit wirft ein Schimmern an jede Wand. Sie lieben und begehren einander, sie heiraten, ziehen nach New York. Ihre Partys sind legendär, und irgendwann feiert Lotto Triumphe als Dramatiker. Ist das. Fates and Furies | Groff, Lauren | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch Amazon. Fates and Furies: A Novel | Groff, Lauren | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und Verkauf duch Amazon. Inhaltsangabe zu "Fates and Furies". Every story has two sides. Every relationship has two perspectives. And sometimes, it turns out, the key to a great marriage. Auf Papier gelesen Fates and Furies (Riverhead Books, ) von Lauren Groff war sicher eines der heiß-erwartesten Bücher der Herbstsaison - und wurde.
September , Uhr. Veranstaltungsort: Buchhandlung Lehmkuhl, Leopoldstraße 45, München Eintritt 7€. "Licht und Zorn" / "Fates and Furies. Inhaltsangabe zu "Fates and Furies". Every story has two sides. Every relationship has two perspectives. And sometimes, it turns out, the key to a great marriage. Auf Papier gelesen Fates and Furies (Riverhead Books, ) von Lauren Groff war sicher eines der heiß-erwartesten Bücher der Herbstsaison - und wurde. Other Editions Pun intended. Email us at feedback orlandoweekly. We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day. I hated this novel. View all 23 comments. Zwischen Poesie und dreckigem Sex ist es nicht weit. Nach FuГџball Internet ersten Seiten war ich kurz davor, das Buch abzubrechen. Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google-Konto. Kurzmeinung: Ein beeindruckendes und überraschendes Source, das mir noch lange im Gedächtnis bleiben wird. Aber auch die vielen Figuren konnte ich mir nicht alle merken und viele Handlungen hatten keine Folgen und ändernde Zustände keine Begründungen. Der Amerikahaus Verein e. Du kommentierst https://astropublication.co/europa-casino-online/monkey-game.php Deinem Twitter-Konto. Dieser Roman hat mich sofort here wie ein Thriller.
There is none of that "love to hate" here. Lotto and Mathilde are merely obnoxious and irritating. The plot is revealed, almost in its entirety, by the book description.
This is about a marriage, told from the two different sides and, clearly, we are going to get a very different view from each side.
There is no "twist" really, just a changing view of events and characters. There is also a running metaphor tied in with Greek mythology, which some might perceive as feminist.
To be honest, I liked the idea of the feminist symbolism more than the heavy-handed execution. The idea is that women are always more than they seem, today and historically, smart and cunning behind the scenes, manipulating events like the Greek Fates and Furies themselves.
But the author kind of bashes us over the head with the cleverness of her own metaphor. In fact, many things were done wrong.
Lotto is a playwright and the book contained long extracts from his plays, which was incredibly tedious.
I also didn't want to use the P-word in a book with a word mission like this, but damn, it is pretentious.
Sorry, but He would have liked to go deeper into her, to seat himself on the seat of her lacrimal bone and ride there, tiny homunculus like a rodeo cowboy, understand what it was she thought.
Also, the repetitive and gross descriptions of sex and sexual desire felt unnecessary. I don't mean to be prudish, but everyone in this book is experiencing some kind of weird sexual inclination toward other people.
It seems to be the "thing" these days to deconstruct sex into something political, harsh and unpleasant - Gone Girl did that too - but it was just tiring here.
Not exciting, not interesting, not shocking. He imagined a lifetime of screwing on the beach until they were one of those ancient pairs speed-walking in the morning, skin like lacquered walnut meat.
Even old, he would waltz her into the dunes and have his way with her sexy frail bird bones, the plastic hips, the bionic knee. Fates and Furies feels like a book for readers who genuinely enjoy the exploration of language and metaphor, and do not require some kind of emotional connection with the characters or story.
If you're looking for a twisty mystery with unlikable characters, stick with Gone Girl or The Girl on the Train. If those characters are too unlikable for you, read Tana French or just do that anyway.
If you're looking for a quieter character study about family life, try A Spool of Blue Thread. View all 65 comments. Oct 02, Vegantrav rated it did not like it.
Two word review: pretentious garbage. My apologies to the author, Lauren Groff, for being so harsh, but this novel is terrible. We still have almost 3 full months remaining, but I have no doubt it will at least be in the top 3 worst reads of the year.
I hated this novel. I only finished reading hate-reading, actually so I could have an outlet for my anger and disappointment: namely, writing a review of this novel.
Reading the description that Two word review: pretentious garbage. A dazzling examination of a marriage. The only expectation it defies is that of one expecting to read good literature.
It is dazzling only in its level of insipid ludicrousness. I am so angry that this book, so highly touted and so extravagantly praised 1.
These latter two books are touted as two of the biggest books of the year. After reading two such good works of literature especially the Winslow novel , it was truly disappointing to encounter something so awful as Fates and Furies.
How this novel made it onto the longlist of finalists for the National Book Award is beyond my comprehension.
Yes, one of our protagonists is called Lotto. If I may, I shall, without spoiling anything, simply list some of the inanities of this novel: 1.
Mathilde once allowed a leech that had latched onto her leg to stay because she was so lonely. Lotto thought this story was so touching that, years later, he began telling it as if it were his own.
Yes, Mathilde was so lonely she let a parasite suck on her for a few days until it fell off in the shower, and when it fell off, she was sad.
And her husband found this story moving. Because lonely children love parasites sucking on their flesh.
This is idiocy that defies description. About 5 months after Lotto's mother, Antoinette, has died, Lotto is discussing how he and his mother had been estranged.
Lotto is very emotional and is tearing up, and Chollie, his best friend, refers to Antoinette as a "loveless cunt" pardon the language, but this is a direct quote.
Ariel mentions, just off the cuff, that he heard Lotto has "come into a shocking inheritance. Because this is how Groff imagines that real people act.
Lotto seems to write a brand new play, cast the actors, and produce and stage that same play all within about a year's time.
And, when most productive, he is churning out one play a year. In what fantasy world of New York theater does Groff thinks that this happens?
Lotto and Mathilde get married after only knowing each other 2 weeks. Before the marriage, Lotto had been exceedingly promiscuous with both women and men, but he immediately settles down completely upon meeting Mathilde, gives up his promiscuous ways, and never comes close to cheating on her throughout their marriage.
I suppose this is within the realm of possibility, but Groff changes Lotto so completely and instantaneously that the change just does not ring true.
The prose is just horrible and ludicrous. At one point, Groff provides a list of the items in massive garbage heap floating in the sea: "Spin of bottles and flip-flops and zip ties and packing peanuts and boas and baby-doll heads and false eyelashes and inflatable taxidermy.
Inflatable taxidermy? Does she even know what taxidermy is? Is she just throwing words on the page randomly?
More horrible prose: ". Fickle, inconstant, that monthly changes in her circle orb" page Her circle orb?
I get the Shakespearean allusion, but still: how utterly pretentious! Lotto and his sister, Rachel, refer to their mother as "muvva.
Lotto and Mathilde have a dog named God. Yep, that's just hilarious, isn't it? It's not that I'm offended by this; I'm not.
I just think it's dumb. Really, really, really dumb. Trying to describe an idyllic scene at Mathilde's grandmother's dairy farm in France a grandmother who, we are told earlier, sold blood sausages on the black market in France during World War II--that's not even a thing: no one sold blood sausages on the black market in France or anywhere ever!
Groff thinks this is a good thing. Ummmm, so if the milk tastes like manure, it's contaminated! That's nasty and gross. That's not how milk is supposed to taste.
I'm a vegan and even I know that milk is not supposed to taste like bovine excrement! Mathilde takes a high-performance Mercedes for a drive at night.
She turns off the headlights and speeds up to mph. She hits a culvert and the car somersaults. Other than biting her tongue pretty badly, she is unhurt.
Seriously: a car wreck at mph and no real injury at all. We get insightful wisdom like this via Mathilde's thoughts on page ".
Groff is not a completely inept writer. Vulgar language does not offend me. This is supposed to pass for good literature?
Okay, so I won't go on any more. I hated everything about this book. Even two of the supposed startling secrets near the end view spoiler [Lotto had a son when he was 15 that was given up for adoption and who then shows up at the end of the novel after Lotto has died and has sex with Mathilde; Mathilde, when she was 4-years-old, seems it's left a bit vague to have intentionally pushed her younger brother down the stairs, which killed him hide spoiler ] left me cold and bored.
This novel is just terrible. Don't read it. Seriously, do not read this pretentious hokum. Apr 23, karen rated it really liked it Shelves: free-from-work.
Gone Girl with slightly nicer people How, so gently, she flicked it and kept him spinning. View all 62 comments.
Book-1 Shelby-0 I hate this book. There I said it. I keep trying to read it and then I look down and it says I still have soooo much time left in this book.
I'm never going to finish. The only character that I'm somewhat interested in is Chollie. The rest of them are just pretentious hipster assholes.
I'm a dnf'er. And I'm proud. Booksource: Netgalley in exchange for review I'm probably totally missing out by not making myself finish this book.
I'm still not gonna do it but my friend Leanne Book-1 Shelby-0 I hate this book. I'm still not gonna do it but my friend Leanne loved it and wrote a beautiful review for the book.
View all 91 comments. May 07, Debbie rated it really liked it Shelves: best-readsthrough , unreliable-narrators , couple-love-and-hate.
Amazingly brilliant. Language to die for. Fascinating characters. Clever format. But why did it take me three weeks to read? This is a complex love story, full of secrets and regrets and passion.
It is absolutely brilliant. Yeah, so why DID it take me so long to read this? At the end, I got to a brilliant twist!
I knew it was brilliant, but wait….. I remember them…. I could search the names and get transported right back to the scenes where the characters were mentioned.
Oh yes, now I see…. Just too long and dense. The sentence structure, though gorgeous, slowed me down. This can be problematic; see my first complaint.
Editor voice: Cut out the plays. Party madness. Super confusing to me. And one hostile conversation where a woman is called a total vagina and later a pig face seemed over-the-top and unbelievable.
Would people at a party actually say such things? The Voice. Give me a dictionary! I like learning a few new words, but there were a LOT here, sometimes two or more to a page.
Reading this would be a great way to learn vocabulary for the SATs. The wife is more dynamic and complex than the husband.
Luckily, her story is the one at the end, so the joy flows as you read on. Joy Jar Okay. Now for the good—no, the incredible—stuff.
To start with, the characters are so vivid, I felt like I really knew what makes them tick. They are complex, intriguing, flawed.
The third-person narration made me believe it all; there were no unreliable narrators to make me worry that any of it was false.
This was so clever! I mean, I love a good unreliable narrator, but here, it was cool the way the narration made everything believable.
I felt like I was in the in-crowd; it made me feel lucky and privileged that I was getting the real scoop. Groff is wise and her ideas are fresh.
Some sentences made me ponder with glee, even if I did have to read them twice! And I ate up the language and the images.
He is deformed, crooked, old and sere; ill-faced, worse bodied, shapeless everywhere; vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind; stigmatical in making, worse in mind.
My best friend. It was a cover for poor hygiene or for body shame. Clean people never aspired to the floral. No marriage is what it seems, and this one is no exception—there are secrets and sorrows and guilt and failures.
Insecurities, vulnerabilities, misunderstandings, and missed opportunities. The characters are often underground, not exposing their real selves—neither their feelings nor actions—to each other, though their mutual love is intense.
If you give voice to the things you think every day about your spouse, you'd crush them to paste. She never lied, just never said.
Groff deftly shows us the history and motives many of which are doozies behind the scenes. The second part is what makes this book sing.
The story made my mind jump, made the book sort of interactive in a cool way, in that as I read the second half of the book, I would naturally remember back to the first way the story was told.
It made my mind love the play of back and forth, as I looked at two versions of one event—pure delight. But, as I said, this was a slow read, especially the first part.
I still think this book is phenomenal, and I think it deserves awards. Jul 01, Carmen rated it did not like it Recommends it for: No One.
Shelves: american-author , fiction , published , book-lover-s-desk-calendar , she-says , traditionally-published.
No amount of beautiful language can gild this piece of shit. View all 50 comments. May 27, Joodith rated it did not like it Shelves: did-not-finish.
It's not often I say I hate a book, but I absolutely hate this, and yes, I realise I'm sticking my neck out, and I'll more than likely be in the minority, but c'est la vie.
He calls his mother Muvva! They are beautiful of course - who wants to read about plain or ugly people? The prose in this book is so over the top, so flamboyant, obscure and ostentatious I just cannot stand it.
This particular passage had me cringing: " She stretched her long arms over her head, and there were little nests of winter hair in the pits.
She could hatch baby robins in those things. She looked at him, savoring her own knowing, his unknowing. Does this author think it's clever to write this way?
I don't know if this her usual style as I haven't read anything of hers - and this certainly does not encourage me to read her earlier books.
It's another case of throwing every word you know, whether it actually makes sense or not - but never mind, it looks impressive.
I don't doubt that Ms Groff toiled long and hard over this, in an effort to write The Great American Novel, but to me it comes across as self-indulgent fiddle-faddle.
Described as "a literary masterpiece that defies expectation. Who is it who decides what I, the reader will like; who is it who calls this a masterpiece?
Those of us who don't agree are already at a disadvantage as we will be expected to explain and justify our reasons, whereas those who agree can sit back smugly.
I dislike this book intensely. End of. Amazon sent me a free copy speficicaly for review purposes. View all 24 comments.
May 02, Elyse Walters rated it really liked it Shelves: netgalley. On the positive note I was interested in the story about the married couple.
I think this book is an excellent commentary on marriage The author captures each character's individuality I like much on this story-- yet..
I'm aware I was often 'detached'. This was not a book for me- that kept me turning pages wit 3. This was not a book for me- that kept me turning pages with urgency.
I enjoyed it reading this novel - but enjoyed my breaks away from it equally as much. I seemed to require reading breaks to recharge my own energy.
Something about this story would begin to drain me. With breaks.. I often 'did' return to my reading with a bright freshness.
I felt the beginning was very strong Yet, after a while, I felt there were too many mind-numbing details that started to suck the energy from the story.
The writing frequently failed to keep my attention. I felt exhausted Although I felt I got to know the characters pretty well.
I didn't feel strong emotions. I was't 'feeling' any human frailty, or sadness, or joy Possibly if this novel wasn't as long I might have had a chance to directly feel more about each of the characters..
This is a big- long- lush- slowly progressing story It's also possible - that this story may grow on me as time goes on.
I'm aware that 'sometimes' books are enhanced for me once I begin engaging in book discussions. This might just be one of those books!
Thank you to the publisher, Netgalley, and the author, for allowing me to read this. View all 73 comments.
The ability to have the courage to mend the cracks that appear in an alarming speed as the years go by. Now, in the marriage of Lotto and Mathilde, the cracks are there from the beginning.
Especially in Lotto and all they have to do is to ignore them and move on. But Groff's novel is completely devoid of cracks or any other fault for that matter.
In fact, it is plain and s ''There was an enormous crack in the world. In fact, it is plain and simple, one of the most interesting, daring and honest books I've ever had the pleasure to read.
I chose to read this novel, guided by the raving reviews of many beloved friends here, in Goodreads, and attracted by the claim that Groff had been inspired by Ancient Greek Tragedy.
I was surprised to see that this is not just a very well-written love story, but also an immensely beautiful trip down the historical changes that New York and its society underwent from the early 90s all the way through our troubled present.
To do so through the eyes of a squad of artists, in all their vanity and sensitivity, was satisfying and, frankly, hugely entertaining.
Groff touches upon so many subjects, one wouldn't know where to begin. The way I see it, the main themes are love and aspirations.
We witness a relationship that starts in a rather unorthodox way. Lotto and Mathilde get married out of the blue and then, they have to learn how to live together, how to fight the daily problems, how to know each other and come to understand themselves in the process.
Their relationship is presented in such a beautiful way that even a sworn enemy of marriage such as myself has to take a step back and contemplate for a while.
However, in my opinion, the notion that lies at the heart of the story is the way our aspirations influence our course in life once they are fulfilled or-worse- once we realise that they have become dreams of a past that is slowly fading away Groff's writing took me back to the time when I was studying, when me and my friends thought that we would be able to change the world once we graduate from university.
Instead, we slowly found out that the world actually changed us. Worries about our families, our work, our financial status, our relationships with our loved ones, all those things that make you feel you have entered the universe of the adults and their responsibilities.
Lotto, in particular, changes route and tries to fulfill his ambitions from a different starting point. And he succeeds. She remains the steady rock that binds him to the present and holds their life together.
Mathilde makes the decision to stop working after Lotto's success -which took a long time to take place- and becomes the wife who cleans, cooks, etc.
Perhaps, she didn't want to follow her dreams, after all. Perhaps,she found fulfillment through the role of the lady of the house, perhaps she needed to cast away her own demons of the past.
I don't know and I don't judge her. I respect it, but I don't understand it, and it was at that time when I felt that the book was too centered to Lotto and his actions.
This was too harsh of me, but I couldn't have foreseen the great bomb that exploded and shuttered everything to pieces The language she uses is so powerful, so immediate, so creative.
The style is unique, a third-person narration, with some slight but intricately woven hints of stream of consciousness. The dialogue is sharp, without unnecessary words, the pace leaves you breathless in a story that spans over twenty years, centered on two people.
I enjoyed the New York colloquialisms and the fact that I could see and feel the changing city over the years, changes that were depicted in the characters and their interactions.
What is the most fascinating element in this novel? For me, it is the title. Fates and Furies Why Fates? Why Furies?
It had me wondering. The notion of Fate lies at the centre of the Greek tragedies, the three women who controlled and, eventually, cut the thread of all mortals' lives, the Moirai : Clotho, Atropos and Lachesis.
The Furies, the Erinyes, were wild, winged female deities. Alecto, Megaera and Tisiphone. They hunted and haunted the wrongdoers without mercy, for the rest of their lives.
Orestes is the well-known example, punished for the murder of his mother, Clytemnestra. So, Fates and Furies are our daily escorts, from the moment we are born until the day we depart from this world.
They are the two sides of the same coin and Groff uses them in such a successful way that would make Euripides, Sophocles and Aeschylus proud I was reading this book while I was commuting to work and back.
There were instances when it almost slipped off my hands out of sheer shock, others because of my anger caused by certain stupid decisions of the couple.
I don't know how can anyone read this novel and feel absolutely nothing. I think it's impossible. One cannot remain indifferent in front of life and Lauren Groff takes life's notions, twists them and awakes every bit and every kind of emotion to the reader.
It is a book that speaks with a voice of anger, despair and hope, and we feel compelled to listen May 02, Esil rated it it was amazing Shelves: netgalley.
I started reading Fates and Furies a few times and my interest quickly waned because the writing felt impenetrable.
But this time I forced myself to read beyond the first few pages, and after sticking it out for a while I got completely sucked in -- by the writing, the concept, the atmosphere and the story.
Groff's writing is unusual, both in style and in pacing. Her sentences feel messy and there's an arrhythmic staccato to the way in which the story moves forward.
But once I fell in step Wow! But once I fell in step with her beat, I didn't want to let go. In the first part, she had a brilliant lengthy section, in which the passage of time is marked by drifting from one gathering to another, in increments of approximately one year, the movement to another year marked by small changes in the dynamics between people and the eventual mention of a new occasion.
And Groff brilliantly seamlessly shifts points of view, occasionally moving the story away from the two main characters and looking through the lens of the supporting cast -- even working in a brief lovely cat's view at one point.
As I say, I loved the writing, but there's also a real richness to the story that kept me wanting to read. And shame on anyone who makes any comparison between this book and Gone Girl.
The only commonality is that the stories are focused on marriages in which husbands and wives live in different realities. But Fates and Furies is an entirely different story -- it's not a mystery or a thriller -- it's about the the intense love and disparity between Lotto and Matilde throughout their twenty year plus marriage.
The first part focuses on Lotto -- the big egotistical son of a wealthy Florida family -- and his perspective on life with Matilde -- his intense love, mixed in with self absorption and neediness.
In the second half, we double back and get Matilde's point of view -- including a view into her impoverished dark childhood and adolescence, and her intense love for Lotto, mixed in with a fury and secretiveness fuelled by her past.
For me, this made for a complex, layered, beautiful, emotional novel. It's clear from reviews that this book is not everyone's cup of tea and I suspect that for some the writing will be a turn off as it was for me initially, but -- wow again -- after getting over my initial hesitation, this was a really rich reading experience.
I hadn't read anything else by Groff, but I've had Arcadia waiting on my shelf for a long time which I will definitely get to sometime soon.
Thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for an opportunity to read an advance copy. View all 55 comments.
Jul 16, Jen rated it really liked it. The characters in this novel are despicable, spiteful and plain unlikeable. This is the love story of Lotto and Mathilde.
The Fates: The building up of a 20 year marriage. The Furies: The delayering of it. From perfection to perfectly flawed characters stripped of their stories living in their own play.
The final act: A death reveals a truth. This is a backwards, upside down spiral of a story that will require the reader to piece it The characters in this novel are despicable, spiteful and plain unlikeable.
This is a backwards, upside down spiral of a story that will require the reader to piece it back together again in an attempt to decipher the people who we believe we are closest to; whom we think we know and love, when in reality, have never been further from the truth.
The lengths one woman would go for love in order to protect it. Groff writes splendid prose with Shakespearean and mythological references woven in.
Read it, relish it. I'm not a huge fan of plays which has me keeping this at a 4. I'm going to round down this time. View all 45 comments.
Apr 21, Ron Charles rated it it was amazing Shelves: novels-about-art , favorites. Even from her impossibly high starting point, Lauren Groff just keeps getting better and better.
Spanning decades, oceans and the whole economic scale from indigence to opulence, this novel holds within Even from her impossibly high starting point, Lauren Groff just keeps getting better and better.
Spanning decades, oceans and the whole economic scale from indigence to opulence, this novel holds within its grasp the story of one extraordinary marriage.
Not yet 40, Groff nonetheless captures the complicated ways love blesses, transforms and, yes, deceives us over many years. View all 5 comments.
Jun 02, Sarah rated it liked it Shelves: arc. View all 7 comments. Sep 16, Cher rated it did not like it Shelves: overrated , audiobook , contemporary.
This could be the first addition to a new genre, literary erotica lite. If that makes you excited or more interested to read it, don't set yourself up for disappointment.
The author "tells" you that the couple have this epic, out of this world love for one another, 1. The author "tells" you that the couple have this epic, out of this world love for one another, but all you are "shown" is a superficial, childish, unhealthy relationship driven by lust, which could never be confused for love.
The first half, Fates, is told from the husband's point of view and was utterly painful to read. This almost worthless part of the book was filled with a trashy log of his sexual conquests don't get excited - the sex is all very uninspiring , with scattered catty gossip for added mental torture.
There was absolutely no substance a reader could sink their teeth into - just pretentious fluffiness that aspired to be bold, but fell far short of the goal.
The second half, Furies, is told from the wife's point of view and is a marked improvement from the 1st half of the novel but still only worthy of an average rating, at best.
More salacious sex but at least there is some sort of depth to the story and the brief glimpses of the interesting character, Antoinette, create a spark of interest.
What a horrible disappointment from my most anticipated Fall release. It is simply a shallow read that I won't remember by the end of the month.
And that huge "shocking" twist at the end of the book? Not shocked. No cares to give. I seriously doubt I will ever be tempted to pick up another book by this author; We're clearly not a fit for one another.
If you'd like to also read a positive take on this one from one of my trusted reviewers we can't see eye to eye on every thing or life would be boring!
View all 23 comments. May 24, Katie rated it it was amazing Shelves: published , husbands-wives , set-in-the-us. A generalisation of course.
The novel is split into two perspectives of the same marriage — Lotto, the husband the fates and Mathilde, the wife the furies.
Lotto immediately idealises Mathilde. He wants to see her as pure, a saint. And sustains this idea by showing little curiosity about her past which, of course, means her inner life.
Lotto is like a golden Labrador, bounding around good naturedly, living in the moment, trusting in the world to deliver up everything he needs.
We get an early hint at just how strenuously Mathilde is supporting him in his wilfully myopic naivety when his ambitions to become an actor come to nothing and it is she who supports him by working.
What Lotto thinks he earns through good fortune and the purity of his ambition we learn has often been the result of Mathilde pulling hidden strings in the dark.
Would Scott have been such an inspired author without Zelda? The ending, which seeks to tie up the high drama motifs, is probably the least satisfying thing about this novel.
Kind ones, mostly. She never lied. Just never said. View all 48 comments. Jan 03, s. A rather generic novel kept alive by a potent prose.
Overly plot dependent and rather stifling gender-role heavy. I'll save you my 3 page ramblings because why do so when James Wood already summed this up perfectly in his review in the New Yorker.
Narrative secrets are not the same as human mysteries, a lesson that novelists seem fated to forget, again and again; the former quickly confess themselves, and fall silent, while the true mysteries go on speaking.
Fans of Gone Girl style novels will probably like this a lot—and they should definitely read this—and feel rewarded for the depth and prose that goes beyond Flynn's ability.
Groff can spin a metaphor with the best of them. It pokes at the modern marriage and the life of modern artistic types, which is pretty great, but nothing to write home about, or bother writing about on here.
Once you realize the intent is to wow the reader with 'twists' there is a great Nabokov quote about only juvenile authors using twists, and another by Carver saying that twist gimmicks are the quickest way for a book to land in his trash can , any twist then becomes actually rather predictable.
Archived from the original on March 17, Retrieved October 11, Categories : Seoul Broadcasting System television dramas South Korean television series debuts s South Korean television series Korean-language television programs South Korean romance television series South Korean melodrama television series South Korean television series endings Television series by IHQ.
Hidden categories: CS1 Korean-language sources ko Articles with short description Articles containing Korean-language text Articles with hAudio microformats Album infoboxes lacking a cover Album articles lacking alt text for covers Track listings with input errors Official website not in Wikidata HanCinema drama ID same as Wikidata.
Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version.
Promotional poster. Jung Dong-yoon Cho Young-min. Total length:.